You can do whatever you want with your money, but don't tell me that the only ones who will be hurt if workshops go shut down would be actors. The main ones hurt would be the people running the workshops, followed by the CDs and associates who make thousands of dollars out of it - STEADY INCOME. I understand there might be other valid point of views out there (though I haven't seen them yet), but why would you say such nonsense as "the only ones hurt"...
so ur saying dont continuously spend money even on classes? i feel the same way about a lot of teachers; just cranking money out of students who are never getting better.
just another actor..
Holy sh$t, that's astute. lol.
And I agree.
OK, I'll chime in one more time before this dead horse has been beaten into another universe.
Workshops DO work to occasionally get work. Cinnabon Monster is a VERY specific type and a good actor - two factors that help an actor move forward - regardless of whether or NOT you decide to pay for a relationship.
But for the majority of actors who do workshops, the results are dismal. The fact is that workshops are like an industry pyramid scheme. The Cinnabon Monsters or the few others who rave about their grand successes (who can forget Kathryn Joosten's incessant cheerleading for the workshop lobby?), there are 98% who walk away with nothing. Absolutely nothing. These "losers" are the ones who lay the foundation, paving the way by funding the workshop scheme so that the few winners can succeed.
But is that the point?
The conversation here reconfirms that actors are paying for consideration for work when they attend workshops. Although there's an occasional nugget of wisdom from Muffy or Buffy, paying a casting assistant in a workshop to "demystify the casting process" is like paying a hooker to learn how to juggle. Dude, we know why you're there. Even if the percentages of workshop successes were astronomical and all the money you paid to a casting assistant resulted in a job, you're basically be paying a bribe for that opportunity.
And that's against the law.
The conversation here is important because it reconfirms that workshops represent a racket where actors pay millions (not hyperbole) to be considered for acting jobs and casting associates are paid hundreds of thousands of dollars (not an exaggeration) to consider these actors. And the winners in this "arrangement" are not the actors, although the workshop industry would have you believe that's the case. The clear victors in the workshop racket are the casting associates of Hollywood and the brokers who sell to access to those people.
There are alternatives to paying casting clerks for recognition. But as stated in this thread, there are not nearly enough. The chilling effect that workshops have on seeing actors in any other way that doesn't include writing a check is profound. Theatre, acting classes, graduating showcases...general interviews? What used to be the industry standards for actually scouting new talent have disappeared and have been replaced by paying to be scouted.
But here is a truism that will exist long after workshops are shut down and the biggest offenders are frog marched off to prosecution.
Casting directors will always need good actors. And - trust me - if workshops go away, they will still find them.
Billy DaMota is right in that casting workshops have indeed become the primary source for casting folks to find actors. It will be very unlikely that it will be shut down anytime soon because all workshop facilities are by law to state that they do not guarantee employment or auditions. I'm curious to see if there can be a definite way to prove that they are illegal because from a few lawyer folks I spoke to, it is considered "networking". Then again, they may not be wrong. Who knows.
It is true casting folks can earn a whole lotta moola by doing this, so for them to stop doing them would almost be similar to chopping a cash cow into bloddy bits.
If we were to take away casting workshops completely, casting folks would have to attend plays, comedy shows, standup routines, watch the hottest YouTube videos, and etc. Compared that to just attending a workshop and getting paid for it? I feel the overwhelming majority will go for the latter, like Billy said.
This is indeed a dead horse being beaten over and over. I highly doubt we'll see any changes because we will always have new actors who will take these workshops, the actors who think it's a good idea to take as many workshops as possible without even remotely thinking about their marketing or understanding that diligent professional followups are required.
When did he say that?
And can we get rid of our agents now?
Maybe not the exact words PRIMARY, but defacto
I thought he said the majority of actors get nothing from it, but eventually some actors do get work. And those are actors that are good and would be found whether workshops exist or not. That's a very far concept from saying workshops are a de facto method to find talent. I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, which I really don't want to do, but what Billy said was very sensible and now it's being totally distorted.
Yes, you can almost get rid of agents, especially when your agent or manager suggests you attend workshops to "network". If my agent demanded I take workshops (as many do), I'd pay them no commission on the jobs I booked via workshops.
And sadly, casting directors are not far behind in terms of early extinction. The irony of celebrating Marion Dougherty in the amazing documentary CASTING BY is that the casting profession is lauding a woman who set the standard for what casting should be - and which is nearly non-existent in today's entertainment industry.
And Cinnabon, what happens in most workshops is not "networking"; it is paying to perform (audition) for the same people who can hire you. If you take the performance aspect out of workshops and made them simply seminars or networking events, I'd have less a problem with them. But that's not gonna happen because the INTENT of workshops is to allow casting people to evaluate your talent via a performance. And that's the legal definition of an audition, which is an actor's job interview.
If there were ever an investigation - a real, in-depth look at what happens in workshops - it's pretty apparent what they'd find.
And just so ya know, the wheels of justice are definitely turning - albeit slowly - and there will be enforcement soon.
With all due respect, I don't agree with that at all. I certainly wouldn't claim to know everybody, but I don't think I know a single 20-something to early-30s working actor who has had anything remotely resembling sustained success who got his or her first break from a CD workshop or would even be caught dead near one. OTOH, I know an awful lot who first got them through graduating showcases followed by being seen doing theatre and through teacher referrals. Of course, an agent or manager has usually been the first step through whom they were introduced to CDs, but there were no shortage of casting people at my showcase a few years ago.
It's really closer to mean girls in middle school. The funny thing is that when the crackdown finally happens and as Billy says, "the biggest offenders are frog marched off to prosecution," the frog marchers will become Pariahs and those who are just as guilty but weren't busted will most likely express righteous indignation that anyone would exploit newbie actors like that. Crazy town ...
lol it spread to florida:
"actors link florida"
just another actor..
Totally aimed at kids. The traveling workshop circus. Shameful.
TY HARMAN presently working on TWO NEW PILOTS... SMART ALEC FOR NICKELODEON and SUPER AWESOME KATY FOR DISNEY.
$239 for 4 hours with Ty on either Saturday or Sunday.
$289 for 4 hours with Ty on both days for a total of 8 hours with both days.
I can get a whole month training with a real acting coach for that.
"Its the struggle that makes it great"
From last night's Artios Awards, where Linda Lowy accepted her well-deserved Hoyt Boyers award.
Roll backwards? Indeed.
This is the textbook definition of IRONY.
In her acceptance speech, Lowy compelled her fellow casting directors to focus on raising the next generation of casting directors.”How do we preserve the truthfulness of the art? We need to encourage the next generation to go to the theater, to know what’s happening outside of L.A., to read, to seek out the classics,” she said. “To truly understand the text and speak not just to who will play the part but to the overall story, genre, tone. To have some knowledge of film history. I don’t know about you, but I’m seeing these things fade. Working in the shadow of great mentors reminds us that we can teach young minds to trust their vision amidst the ever-growing maze of distractions. Without that, we start to roll backwards.”
Scott David is just a crook. I've heard he's never been that involved with casting on the show's he's worked. The guy is seedy, and a little nuts, so he's decided to take his little knowledge and go out and rip off actors. DO NOT do Scott David workshops. EVER!!!
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|