Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Glenn Close
|
'Back in the day' getting put on a "first refusal" basis was a pretty good indicator of a possible booking. But as "not blond" has alluded to, nowadays it doesn't mean much at all, unfortunately. In other words, if a more promising opportunity arises, it may be wise to take it. However, don't confuse "first refusal" with being "On Hold." Often times many people mix-up the terms. 'On Hold' means YOU HAVE ALREADY BOOKED THE JOB. The only thing that can release you is written notice from the producer or advertising agency terminating your obligation, at which time a fee must be paid you for your downtime. www.robertkim.com
|
| |
| Posts: 1011 | Location: New York City | Registered: January 05, 2007 |    |
|
Harrison Ford

|
quote: Originally posted by not blond: We have been told that "on hold' and "first refusal" are two different things. Am i wrong?
They are two different things, but used interchangeably. If there's no contract promising you payment, there's nothing to talk about in any case. And 99% of the time, there's no contract.
|
| |
| Posts: 436 | Location: New York | Registered: May 25, 2006 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2008 The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved.
|