Welcome to the
BACK STAGE MESSAGE BOARD

Please register and login to post.
BackStage.com    Message Board Homepage  Hop To Forum Categories  New Actors Only    principal extra ?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Newbie
Posted
Good morning guys, I have been offered a role in an independent feature film as a "principal extra" I never heared this term before and common scence tells me is probaly an extra with a few seconds and a line or 2 on camera. Is this acurate ? or can anyone tell me if is not, then what does it mean ??.

Thank you once again.
Arti
 
Posts: 14 | Location: New York | Registered: August 20, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Morgan Freeman
Posted Hide Post
heck, in the non-union world, anything goes. I have seen AGENT-EXTRA, where the non-union agent shows up to do extra work for 40 bucks.
 
Posts: 355 | Location: New York | Registered: August 18, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Russell Crowe
Posted Hide Post
Arti, Its just an extra!!!! No--- still no lines. Even one line would push you up to under 5 /dayplayer role --
 
Posts: 218 | Location: new York | Registered: December 21, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Morgan Freeman
Posted Hide Post
Sounds like a featured extra, where you would get more screen time than a reg. extra or you get the scene solo w/the principle actor(s).
 
Posts: 245 | Location: seattle | Registered: August 14, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Denzel Washington
Picture of miss stone
Posted Hide Post
I HIGHLY doubt there are any lines. In "Titanic" some were called "core" extras, meaning featured but that is about it.
 
Posts: 685 | Location: the universe | Registered: June 04, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Sean Penn
Posted Hide Post
"Principal extra" is an oxymoron. So is "featured extra," for that matter. These non-existent terms are thrown around to make extra work sound more attractive. An extra is an extra-period. The only thing that would make extra work more attractive to me is more cash-because it certainly will not help your career. Higher-based extra work or commercial bg are worth doing. But if it pays $64/8 or $75/10 you are nothing but cheap labor to the production. Regardless of how much you are "featured."
 
Posts: 194 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: January 15, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Morgan Freeman
Posted Hide Post
You're seen more when you're a featured extra than an extra. You're also in more scenes (than reg. extra). You also get a name for your charcter and you get to do more things than the reg. extra.
 
Posts: 245 | Location: seattle | Registered: August 14, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Sean Penn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skeeterkitty2004:
You're seen more when you're a featured extra than an extra. You're also in more scenes (than reg. extra). You also get a name for your charcter and you get to do more things than the reg. extra.


Unfortunately, this is all bunk. As an extra you are at the mercy of the editor as well as the PAs/ADs who place you-none of those terms mean anything. A few years ago I worked a for 3 weeks on a film as a "core," featured, regular,(all of these terms were thrown out there) whatever you want to call it, extra. In the final edited version I was never seen. On another film, I worked one day as nobody special and sat in holding for 10 hours, then did one scene at the end of the day. I was clearly recognizable on screen for several shots.

If your "character" has an actual name(like Joe Smith), it probably means you were upgraded. "Office worker," "pedestrian," etc. are not character names. They're descriptions for extras.

The only things you can get out of straight extra work are money, SAG eligibility if you get vouchers and perhaps intrinsical things like seeing yourself on screen. You can't put it on a resume regardless of it's "featured" status.
 
Posts: 194 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: January 15, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Johnny Depp
Posted Hide Post
It's not acting, so it doesn't hep your resume.
 
Posts: 56 | Location: The ether | Registered: May 18, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Morgan Freeman
Posted Hide Post
Some of it can be be considered acing. Directors (in casting calls) want actors that have acting experience to do them (featured extras). the first day that I did this one film they only wanted actors that had acting experience (on camera) for the first day. We had to sing one word (like we're) doing a song and some other things the first day. The next couple of days, it didn't matter if you hadacting experience or not. I ended up saying one word and shown in about 5-7 scenes.
 
Posts: 245 | Location: seattle | Registered: August 14, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

BackStage.com    Message Board Homepage  Hop To Forum Categories  New Actors Only    principal extra ?

© 2008 The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved.