Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Hilary Swank
|
The short answer is "No", especially if you ARE watching films you're likely to get cast in. Which is the most important thing, from a professional point of view. This said, if you're networking with people who are true cinephiles, yeah, it'd be better to know some film history. But the question there is how important those relationships are, and how much those people expect you to be like them, rather than just liking you for who you are. It's also true that there's a lot of good to be had from seeing the great films. You get an idea of what types of stories have most affected people, who the great actors are (and the difference between acting and star power), etc. And you'll then have fun seeing all the ideas that get copped by more recent directors. But it's also a never-ending task, even if you only stick to American films (and many of the great black and whites are French), so it's not like it's to everybody's taste. So, sure it would be good for your overall culture to know the history of film (as it would also be good to read poetry, go to museums, travel a bit, etc.), but if you're watching contemporary films (and the better, or at least more influential, TV shows) regularly, you may well be ahead of a lot of other actors.
|
| |
| Posts: 413 | Location: North Hollywood, CA | Registered: July 18, 2005 |    |
|
Hilary Swank
|
Think of watching films and seeing plays as part of your training!! You need to understand the context of your work. You see just 2 movies a week, and you are 19 with no kids!? You should be able to add another one per week--how about one classic or great acting film per week!? Get Netflix and dig in!
|
| |
| Posts: 522 | Location: Los Angeles, CA | Registered: February 14, 2008 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2008 The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved.
|