Do I need stronger ones? Any feedback would be appreciated. I'm still finding it kind of difficult to distinguish between an OK headshot and a GREAT one.
Thanks.
Posts: 8 | Location: Los Angeles, CA | Registered: June 27, 2009
The first one is warm and a good example of what can be done outdoors with the right diffusion. The second one, in contrast is flat, too cold and not usable. The first one is usable but like faith mentioned, you can still do better.
Originally posted by Victoria Vertuga: Do better is kinda vague.
What would make the first one better? The lighting, the expression, etc?
In all honesty the only concerns I have with the first one is the composition and background. The lighting, albeit outdoors is perfect, something the militant studio-only army around here should take a hard look at, as it's evident that natural light under the right photographer's hands can produce exceptional work. You also look great.
I like the commercial one. It needs to be worked on in photoshop and cropping it can take away that certain awkward feel that Faithlove mentioned. Granted, working backwards is not optimal but you can extract a nice shot from this commercial shot.
The thing with the legit one that I really don't like is the make up. Next time you shoot, hire a pro make up artist.
You look great in both shots though. When you do get the right make up and lighting you'll look awesome!
One of the most common challenges when shooting outdoors is CONSISTENCY.
"Consistency" means, the photographer's ability to control the light so that all of your photos come out equally well.
This is a classic example of that problem. If you'll notice, your theatrical shot came out extremely well. But the commercial shot suffered terribly. They are simply unusable. The skin tones are so flat and washed-out that no amount of Photoshopping will help them to any marked degree. You need to request a re-shoot on these.
Fortunately, your photographer managed to pull it off with the dramatic shot. I concur with Rod Goodman on the absolute necessity of a good makeup artist! I would simply reduce the eyeliner on this one, which can easily be accomplished with retouching. This minor improvement will lend a much more natural appearance to your overall look, allowing your intense eye color to shine through without closing down the eye. Smooth-out the ruddy complexion a bit, and you'll have a great headshot.
So a little bit tighter crop with the background somewhat blurred? Thanks!
The idea was to minimize the impact of the background, making it less of an outdoors distraction, not simply "blurring it". The adjustment I made in the crop re-established your image into the "thirds" ideal for this type of headshot. Good luck
Originally posted by Robert Kim Photography: One of the most common challenges when shooting outdoors is CONSISTENCY.
"Consistency" means, the photographer's ability to control the light so that all of your photos come out equally well.
This is a classic example of that problem. If you'll notice, your theatrical shot came out extremely well. But the commercial shot suffered terribly. They are simply unusable. The skin tones are so flat and washed-out that no amount of Photoshopping will help them to any marked degree. You need to request a re-shoot on these.
Fortunately, your photographer managed to pull it off with the dramatic shot. I concur with Rod Goodman on the absolute necessity of a good makeup artist! I would simply reduce the eyeliner on this one, which can easily be accomplished with retouching. This minor improvement will lend a much more natural appearance to your overall look, allowing your intense eye color to shine through without closing down the eye. Smooth-out the ruddy complexion a bit, and you'll have a great headshot.
The make-up is fine in the good one (warm one), just a little heavy on the eyeliner but by no means bad make-up. Again, it's a great shot, just needs a little post-love. Good luck
The second one needs to be trashed. Seriously. Even warming it up would look wrong. If you have the raw file, go into your WB setting and play with the white balance. Even then, it'll be a bad shot most likely, but it's worth trying out.
Originally posted by Victoria Vertuga: They were two different photographers shot on two different days, so yeah...that would explain the differences.
Question.
Why was it necessary to pay two different photographers and two different makeup artists?
In any event, do not return to the second photographer-- have the first person take your commercial shot, as well. Request the makeup artist to use a more natural approach, particularly for this look.