lol, but I thought natural light was a terrible idea?
Another example of how natural light can be controlled with the right photographer. As for the OP's question, he's solid. However I do think slightly overpriced for the quality and market. But he's a fine choice.
I have to say that while it's good stuff on the website, it appears to my eye that a lot of the work is heavily worked on in post. By that I mean that you may not be as happy with the Raw images from the session as you will be with the finished retouched images. My 2 cents.
In the thread, "Should I meet with the photographer?" I strongly advised the importance of meeting the photographer, first.
With all that can go wrong in a photo session and all the diverse elements that must be coordinated prior to a successful shoot, I believe a personal meeting to discuss your goals in advance is a vital and important part of your session.
This photographer does not offer this option.
Before you consider anyone, always read the "fine print."
Posts: 1892 | Location: New York City | Registered: January 05, 2007