Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Al Pacino

|
Really it means nothing more or less than an actor whom other actors love to watch, even if the public hasn't quite caught on. Ed Harris has some fame, but I doubt the public appreciates him anywhere as generally as many of his peers. Ellen Burstyn has come SO close to full-on stardom, but even those who think of her as a star probably have a limited appreciation for just how strong she is, compared to what other actors will see. There are people like Sean Penn who are both stars and actors' actors. Or people like Robert Duvall and Anthony Hopkins who labored at the edges for years before one role made the rest of the world sit up and pay attention. I think the nuance comes in in the understanding how much skill is involved in some work, or how rare the results themselves are, as opposed to just buying or being touched by the character. Personally, I have a whole list of "quiet moments" that many might take for granted, but where one sees really memorable actors - stars or not - expertly doing "nothing". By the way, I think the film "Pollack" is one of the great examples of seeing two "actors' actors" work together and at the top of their game. There are two marvelous moments in particular where Harris does nothing but react - one when they come back from their first date and she quite simply begins to undress for bed while he stands frozen in the hallway and another when she has left him with his latest young lovely and he registers how absolutely lost he is without her. You could almost read their whole relationship in those two shots.
|
| |
| Posts: 990 | Location: North Hollywood, CA | Registered: July 18, 2005 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|